Jones, a New York building inspector who accepts bribes from developers is charged with violating the New York official misconduct statute. His trial in state court results in an acquittal. Smith, another building inspector who also accepts bribes, is later charged with official misconduct under the same statute, but the trial court dismisses the case because the prosecution is barred by the New York statute of limitations. A year later, a federal grand jury indicts Jones and Smith for violating Racketeer Influenced and Corrupt Organizations Act (RICO), citing only violations of the New York official misconduct statute as predicate crimes. Does the RICO indictment properly allege offenses that are chargeable and punishable under New York law? Compare: United States v. Davis, 576 F.2d 1065 (3d Cir. 1978), and United States v. Frumento, 563 F.2d 1083 (3d Cir. 1977), and Von Bulow v. Von Bulow, 634 F. Supp. 1284 (S.D.N.Y. 1986), with United States v. Louie, 625 F.Supp.1327 (S.D.N.Y. 1985). Please cite applicable federal regulations, statutes or cases in support of your analysis.
Freebies just for you
We are available 24/7
We help you complete college assignments in under 24 hours.
Get help with essays, research papers, PowerPoint Presentations, reports, reviews, and projects at incredibly low prices.
New York official misconduct statute
Custom Papers
We will write a custom paper for you at $15.50 $11/page
Free title page
Free reference page
Free formatting
Unlimited revisons
EssayTab is hands down the best essay writing service for college students. I was initially skeptical about the quality of a product that has such a low price point but I can tell you that it’s worth every penny! I’ve been using EssayTab for my essays in college as well as in grad school, and they always deliver excellent content.

College Student