Jones, a New York building inspector who accepts bribes from developers is charged with violating the New York official misconduct statute. His trial in state court results in an acquittal. Smith, another building inspector who also accepts bribes, is later charged with official misconduct under the same statute, but the trial court dismisses the case because the prosecution is barred by the New York statute of limitations. A year later, a federal grand jury indicts Jones and Smith for violating Racketeer Influenced and Corrupt Organizations Act (RICO), citing only violations of the New York official misconduct statute as predicate crimes. Does the RICO indictment properly allege offenses that are chargeable and punishable under New York law? Compare: United States v. Davis, 576 F.2d 1065 (3d Cir. 1978), and United States v. Frumento, 563 F.2d 1083 (3d Cir. 1977), and Von Bulow v. Von Bulow, 634 F. Supp. 1284 (S.D.N.Y. 1986), with United States v. Louie, 625 F.Supp.1327 (S.D.N.Y. 1985). Please cite applicable federal regulations, statutes or cases in support of your analysis.
New York official misconduct statute
20% OFF on your first order
Let’s Get Started
Team with top experts around the globe to succeed in learning
How it works
If you are looking for the best essay writing services for cheap, then you have come to the right place. Essaytab.com specializes in custom academic papers for all levels of students. From high school students to college graduates and undergraduates, all the way up to university students at master’s degree and even doctoral levels.
Place an order
Fill out the order form. Attach any custom instructions.
Pay online safely with major platforms.
We’ll assign your paper to the most suitable writer & editor.
Get your Order
Once complete, we’ll send the paper to your email.